Photo credits: Matt Steen

To see more recent blog posts please visit http://www.sanative.net/blog


Sys-Con Media Reeling After Loss of Major Sponsor

Sys-Con Media has lost Adobe as a sponsor, the community seeing this as a side effect of bad advertising practices and outright poor business management. A primary reason Sys-Con has lost the ability to continue publishing the ColdFusion Developer's Journal is because, without Adobe's backing, their advertising team is ineffective in placing ads in CFDJ. Calls for ad placement  had gone unanswered for weeks and when requests were fulfilled the wrong information was often given.

It is also believed that the majority of persons subscribed to CFDJ actually never requested or paid for a subscription. In order for Sys-Con to increase their "subscriber base" they simply spammed the community with free subscriptions. This is common with all of the Sys-Con Media family of publications.

Obviously this was not enough. Potential advertisers, tired of dealing with poor response and customer service from the advertising department at Sys-Con, failed to purchase enough advertising to keep the journal in circulation. As a result Sys-Con was forced to seek out Microsoft as a sponsor.

Sys-Con's major fear at the moment is the loss of other major sponsors. These sponsors, potentially wary about Adobe's decision to pull out of Sys-Con, may in turn decide to remove their sponsorship as well. In turn, Sys-Con has decided to attack Adobe's ColdFusion product as well as the ColdFusion community, trying to downgrade the obvious discontent among the ColdFusion community as a whole over Sys-Con's underhanded practices.

The previous editorial team from the ColdFusion Developer's Journal has also shed light on the subject, explaining how poorly Sys-Con handled the publication as a whole. Matt Woodward stated "The editorial board--such as it was--didn't serve as an advisory board at all, but rather was seen as a standing pool of free labor for writing articles.". Brian Rinaldi also writes "I was a part of the unfortunate CFDJ Editorial Board, which was kept both uninformed and ignored (so much so that none of the members I am in contact with had any idea this was happening). Therefore, I feel that I know firsthand that Sys-Con as a company could care less about improving CFDJ for quite some time now."

Sys-Con is a failing media company. They know it and are using dirty tactics in a last ditch effort to keep themselves afloat.

note: this story is a parody on the recent Sys-Con "news" that states that "ColdFusion is dead as a doornail". As a media outlet, Sys-Con holds the responsibility to ensure factual and unbiased reporting, which they have not done. As such, they have become the target of this parody, which in actuality, is probably not very far from truth anyway.

Comments
Michael Dinowitz's Gravatar I was on their 'editorial board' until I started up the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. When the 'new' board was announced, I seemed to have been dropped without even knowing about it. Of course, till the last issue of CFDJ I was still listed in their masthead as being on the board.
What was the board? Big names that they could show off to say that they were something real. It was false advertising.
Even their marketing materials were false. "The First & Only ColdFusion Magazine Since 1999" was a lie from day 1 till their death. The first magazine was CFAdvisor. The second was Fusion Authority. They were the third online. They were the first in print, but for over a year they have not been the only.
Bottom line is that CFDJ was simply a vehicle to make money and when the money got shaky, they stopped. Pissing off Adobe is stopping more advertising money, but they have a new sugar daddy in Microsoft (as seen by their annoying video ads).
Lies and greed is all many people will remember of Sys-Con.
# Posted By Michael Dinowitz | 10/10/07 6:09 AM
Dana K's Gravatar We were denied a CFDJ refund and told we would be credited to the new
silverlight journal. I told the person handling the purchasing that
we don't use silverlight, and its the equivalent of ordering an auto repair magazine and receiving good housekeeping the next month.

You have to love a company that would ignore your first 3 emails, yet find time to auto spam you an offer for their new magazine. Their website sums up most you need to know about that company I'd imagine. Low Class.
# Posted By Dana K | 10/10/07 6:46 AM
Michael Dinowitz's Gravatar Ah, you missed the point of their announcement. They didn't say the magazine was being canceled, just renamed/repurposed. That way they don't have to refund anything. Sneaky and standard for them
# Posted By Michael Dinowitz | 10/10/07 6:51 AM
Dana K's Gravatar The purchaser where I work said there is recourse since they were renaming the publication and changing its topic. I'm sure it will be dropped eventually though since its not that much money and would cost more in labor to pursue the refund. sad, but what can you do =\
# Posted By Dana K | 10/10/07 9:03 AM
TJ Downes's Gravatar If there were enough PAYING subscribers a class action lawsuit would be in order, but considering the majority of their subscribers are people they give the magazine away to for free then I would doubt that there were enough folks to participate in a class action. It is my guess that Sys-Con is relying on this fact.
# Posted By TJ Downes | 10/10/07 9:06 AM
Michael Dinowitz's Gravatar And remember that because the magazine is being repurposed, they can claim the same subscriber/readership numbers when shopping it around to advertisers. Slick and sneaky
# Posted By Michael Dinowitz | 10/10/07 9:30 AM
Bill Gates's Gravatar The Sys-Con website is a how-not-to example of web design. There are so many advertisements on the website I don't even know where the real content begins. Not to mention the content sucks. It is the most horrible barrage of popups, flyovers, banners, videos, popunders I've ever experienced on one site. I can't wait for this beast to die. I can't believe they made it this far.
# Posted By Bill Gates | 10/10/07 10:15 AM
Darth Sidious's Gravatar CRAP... I purchased a subscription and you're telling me there were free ones to be had! :(
# Posted By Darth Sidious | 10/10/07 11:28 AM
TJ Downes's Gravatar If you had canceled your sub I am sure you would have still received them ;)
# Posted By TJ Downes | 10/10/07 11:30 AM
Darth Sidious's Gravatar Well if they converted our subscriptions to the Web Developers Journal or this supposed new Flex Developers Journal, I'd be ok with that. I'm curious to know as much as I can, so getting some insight into Silverlight is cool, but the subscription isn't exactly super cheap.
# Posted By Darth Sidious | 10/10/07 11:35 AM
Matt Quackenbush's Gravatar I had a "subscription" to CFDJ from 1999 until they canceled the rag. However, I think the last issue that I actually paid for was in 2000 or possibly early 2001.
# Posted By Matt Quackenbush | 10/11/07 11:23 AM
BlogCFC 5.8.001 © Ray Camden